Labels

60 Minutes (1) 9/11 (3) abortion (1) acting (5) activism (4) adaptation (1) advertizing (2) age (1) amendment (1) america (6) American Dream (4) american people (5) articles (1) arts funding (2) assassination (2) banking system (3) Banks (1) beach (1) beliefs (13) Bible (6) big government (5) big money (7) big oil (3) billionaires (3) bin Laden (1) budget battle (1) business (8) capitalism (10) Catholic Church (1) Cell Phones (1) chain reaction (1) child abuse (1) childbearing (2) childhood (4) children (4) china (2) choice (3) Christianity (6) christmas (1) Church (1) Cincinnati Ohio (1) Class (2) clean energy (1) climate change (3) coal (1) Cointelpro (1) college (1) comedy (3) Communication (1) conflict of interest (2) congress (6) conservative (2) conservative policies (7) conservatives (5) Constitution (5) corporate america (5) corporations (3) corruption (3) creative process (8) creative puersuits (1) creative pursuits (3) creativity (10) crowdfunding (2) death tax (1) democratic party (2) democrats (2) denial (4) depression (1) disasters (2) disasters. 9/11 (1) dying (2) earthquake (1) ecological issues (5) ecology (3) education (3) elderly/disabled issues (3) elections (1) energy resources (1) entitlements (1) environment (4) environment legislation (1) epa (1) family (4) far right wing (10) fiction (4) film (2) fine art (3) fire arms (1) flat tax (1) fossil fuels (2) founding fathers (1) fox news (2) freedom of speech (3) Fundamentalists (1) gas (1) gay rights (2) george bush (4) George Herbert Walker Bush (1) global warming (4) god (2) government subsidies (2) gratitude (2) health (2) health care (2) heritage foundation (1) Herman Cain (1) hitchhiking (1) holiday season (1) hollywood (3) Homeland Security (2) homosexuality (1) hypocracy (4) ideological viewpoints (4) income (4) Indiegogo (2) investigative reporting (1) investing (1) Islamic Terrorists (1) japan (3) jesus (7) jobs (3) joe Biden (1) Judaism (3) judgements (2) killings in az. (1) King John (1) koch brothers (2) kock brothers (1) la times (1) liberals (1) los angeles (3) love (4) magical realism (3) Martial Law (1) medicaid (1) mental illness (3) middle age (1) Middle America (2) middle class (1) miscarriage (1) monsanto (1) mortgage crisis (1) murder (1) national endowments for the arts (1) National Security (2) nazis (1) new years resolutions (3) news reports (1) newspapers (1) Newt Gingrich (1) novelist (1) novels (2) npr (2) Nuclear Power (3) Obama (2) occupy movement (1) Patriot Act (2) PBS (1) Pearl Harbor (1) peter pan syndrome (1) photos (2) politics (6) pollution (2) poor (2) Portable Devices (1) power (1) President (1) private industry (1) Progressives (1) Prop 23 (1) propaganda (3) quantum physics (1) real estate (1) reform (2) regulation (2) relationships (2) religion (4) religious extremism (5) religious intolerance (4) remembering (1) Republican Candidates (1) repubulican party (2) responsibility (2) revolutionary war (1) rich (1) risk (1) san fransisco (1) sarah palin (3) sarahpac (1) scholarship (1) Science (2) Science Fiction (1) screenplays (1) screenwriter (1) screeplays (3) self-employed (1) self-publishing (3) sexual attraction (2) short stories (4) snow (1) Socialism (1) Star Trek (1) states rights (1) suicide (1) super committee (1) support (1) supreme court (1) surveillance (1) taxes (6) tea party (11) technology (2) term limits (1) Terrorists (1) texting (1) the beatles (1) the big bang (1) the Constitution (2) the democratic party (1) the left (1) the military (1) the new economy (1) The Occupy Movement (2) The Rich (3) Theater (1) time (1) Titannic (1) tucson az. (1) tv (1) Twin Towers (2) u.s. (2) Un-Indicted Conspirators (1) us budget (1) us government (1) Wall Streets (1) wealth (2) weather (3) weathy (1) Welfare (1) wisconsin (1) women (2) work (3) writer (3) writing (5)

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Talk about the "Nuclear Option"...

At a time when our world is teetering on the brink of ecological collapse (yes, I know it's a bright sunny day out there probably as you read this), the Republicans are out to kill off legislation that was hard won and will be hard to get back once they have decimated it.

Other global competitors (especially China) are playing to win this race for a clean energy future, and we should be working together to create the 21st century technologies that will help us grow our stagnant economy, cut pollution even further, and end our over-addiction to oil and other fossil fuels; instead of working against our own good. If China can have clean air standards, why can't the US?

Instead, some in Congress seem more interested in taking us back to the19th century, where you couldn't see for the coal smoke in most major cities. Or even as late as the 1980's, where I'm told that the wir was so thick with pollutions some days, you couldn't see the end of your block.

The latest proposal by Wyoming Senator John Barrasso is  attempting to gut the EPA AND every other federal agency from using the Clean Air Act AND any other environmental law to do anything about reducing America's clean air and climate pollution. After thirty years of improvements, the Republicans want to take us back to the Bad Old Yesteryears.

And just for good measure, it would also preempt state climate actions. Please tell me where these legislators who have in the past been so pro "States Rights" can justify this nonsense?

A similar proposal by West Virginia Senator Jay Rockefeller would halt EPA actions to reduce carbon pollution for at least two years. These proposals are part of a coordinated pro-polluter assault on America's clean air standards that would reverse important progress we've made to cut pollution and promote innovation.

The 21st century will be a clean energy century. If Congress refuses to fulfill its responsibility to pass a strong climate and energy bill, it should at least get out of the way of progress.

I strongly urge you to oppose the Barrasso "Do ABSOLUTELY Nothing on Climate" bill, the Rockefeller "Do Nothing for Two Years" bill, and all bills like them. It's time to respond with courage and fortitude.

[Taken in part from an Environmental Defense Fund letter to be found @
http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=1025 ]