And I"m not talking about either Christmas or the Beginning of the School Year. No, It's Election Time! Or as I refer to it as, time for Electile Dysfunction! And only the Red Pill will cure this one, not the Blue Pill (in either Matrix or Erectile Land).
NO. Elections are rigged. There, I said it. No matter whether you vote for Obama or That Other Guy, guess who is going to win?
Obama was allowed to win the last time, because... Well, because the economic shit was about to hit the fan, and they needed Somebody To Blame. Enter, Barack Obama. Not only a Democrat, but a Democrat of Color. ("See, I told ya one of Them would get us in trouble!") Can you spell Set Up?
So now they want one of Their Own back in office, and, enter Willard "Mitt" Romney. (Why are all the Mormon Higher Ups called "Willard?") Sorry to be blunt. (And I hope I'm just being paranoid.) Just like I predicted pre-Bush in 1998, I think that no matter who the "Popular Vote" comes in for, The Electile Dysfunction College with install ROMULUS into office instead of POTUS.
Just saying. And hope I'm wrong.
where you may find my 'Blogs From The Set' (written generally after the fact), general rants (Politics and Religion mainly), and in the future, sample chapters of my novels (as they get published online to start), and some of my short stories. Stay tuned...
Labels
60 Minutes
(1)
9/11
(3)
abortion
(1)
acting
(5)
activism
(4)
adaptation
(1)
advertizing
(2)
age
(1)
amendment
(1)
america
(6)
American Dream
(4)
american people
(5)
articles
(1)
arts funding
(2)
assassination
(2)
banking system
(3)
Banks
(1)
beach
(1)
beliefs
(13)
Bible
(6)
big government
(5)
big money
(7)
big oil
(3)
billionaires
(3)
bin Laden
(1)
budget battle
(1)
business
(8)
capitalism
(10)
Catholic Church
(1)
Cell Phones
(1)
chain reaction
(1)
child abuse
(1)
childbearing
(2)
childhood
(4)
children
(4)
china
(2)
choice
(3)
Christianity
(6)
christmas
(1)
Church
(1)
Cincinnati Ohio
(1)
Class
(2)
clean energy
(1)
climate change
(3)
coal
(1)
Cointelpro
(1)
college
(1)
comedy
(3)
Communication
(1)
conflict of interest
(2)
congress
(6)
conservative
(2)
conservative policies
(7)
conservatives
(5)
Constitution
(5)
corporate america
(5)
corporations
(3)
corruption
(3)
creative process
(8)
creative puersuits
(1)
creative pursuits
(3)
creativity
(10)
crowdfunding
(2)
death tax
(1)
democratic party
(2)
democrats
(2)
denial
(4)
depression
(1)
disasters
(2)
disasters. 9/11
(1)
dying
(2)
earthquake
(1)
ecological issues
(5)
ecology
(3)
education
(3)
elderly/disabled issues
(3)
elections
(1)
energy resources
(1)
entitlements
(1)
environment
(4)
environment legislation
(1)
epa
(1)
family
(4)
far right wing
(10)
fiction
(4)
film
(2)
fine art
(3)
fire arms
(1)
flat tax
(1)
fossil fuels
(2)
founding fathers
(1)
fox news
(2)
freedom of speech
(3)
Fundamentalists
(1)
gas
(1)
gay rights
(2)
george bush
(4)
George Herbert Walker Bush
(1)
global warming
(4)
god
(2)
government subsidies
(2)
gratitude
(2)
health
(2)
health care
(2)
heritage foundation
(1)
Herman Cain
(1)
hitchhiking
(1)
holiday season
(1)
hollywood
(3)
Homeland Security
(2)
homosexuality
(1)
hypocracy
(4)
ideological viewpoints
(4)
income
(4)
Indiegogo
(2)
investigative reporting
(1)
investing
(1)
Islamic Terrorists
(1)
japan
(3)
jesus
(7)
jobs
(3)
joe Biden
(1)
Judaism
(3)
judgements
(2)
killings in az.
(1)
King John
(1)
koch brothers
(2)
kock brothers
(1)
la times
(1)
liberals
(1)
los angeles
(3)
love
(4)
magical realism
(3)
Martial Law
(1)
medicaid
(1)
mental illness
(3)
middle age
(1)
Middle America
(2)
middle class
(1)
miscarriage
(1)
monsanto
(1)
mortgage crisis
(1)
murder
(1)
national endowments for the arts
(1)
National Security
(2)
nazis
(1)
new years resolutions
(3)
news reports
(1)
newspapers
(1)
Newt Gingrich
(1)
novelist
(1)
novels
(2)
npr
(2)
Nuclear Power
(3)
Obama
(2)
occupy movement
(1)
Patriot Act
(2)
PBS
(1)
Pearl Harbor
(1)
peter pan syndrome
(1)
photos
(2)
politics
(6)
pollution
(2)
poor
(2)
Portable Devices
(1)
power
(1)
President
(1)
private industry
(1)
Progressives
(1)
Prop 23
(1)
propaganda
(3)
quantum physics
(1)
real estate
(1)
reform
(2)
regulation
(2)
relationships
(2)
religion
(4)
religious extremism
(5)
religious intolerance
(4)
remembering
(1)
Republican Candidates
(1)
repubulican party
(2)
responsibility
(2)
revolutionary war
(1)
rich
(1)
risk
(1)
san fransisco
(1)
sarah palin
(3)
sarahpac
(1)
scholarship
(1)
Science
(2)
Science Fiction
(1)
screenplays
(1)
screenwriter
(1)
screeplays
(3)
self-employed
(1)
self-publishing
(3)
sexual attraction
(2)
short stories
(4)
snow
(1)
Socialism
(1)
Star Trek
(1)
states rights
(1)
suicide
(1)
super committee
(1)
support
(1)
supreme court
(1)
surveillance
(1)
taxes
(6)
tea party
(11)
technology
(2)
term limits
(1)
Terrorists
(1)
texting
(1)
the beatles
(1)
the big bang
(1)
the Constitution
(2)
the democratic party
(1)
the left
(1)
the military
(1)
the new economy
(1)
The Occupy Movement
(2)
The Rich
(3)
Theater
(1)
time
(1)
Titannic
(1)
tucson az.
(1)
tv
(1)
Twin Towers
(2)
u.s.
(2)
Un-Indicted Conspirators
(1)
us budget
(1)
us government
(1)
Wall Streets
(1)
wealth
(2)
weather
(3)
weathy
(1)
Welfare
(1)
wisconsin
(1)
women
(2)
work
(3)
writer
(3)
writing
(5)
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Constitution. Show all posts
Saturday, November 3, 2012
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
Do You really feel Safe?
I live in Hollywood, a half a block off of The Boulevard and about two blocks away from The 101 (or for those of you who don't live in LA, Interstate 101). I hear helicopters -- circling, standing rock still hovering in the air, zooooooming past -- what seems like 24/7 these days. There have been nights here where as many as 5-7 chopper flyovers happen in a single night. Chasing Bad Guys. Spotlighting Getaway Vehicles. Sometimes... Doing I don't know what. The LAPD have grown quite reliant on the use of helicopters, even though (from what I've heard) it costs $16,000 (Yes, that's $16k) per minute to keep them there. They better be really Bad Guys to justify that, to my mind.
But it also brings up the whole idea that We The People have tacitly agreed to be constantly surveilled, for our own protection, ever since 9/11. 'It's the cost of Freedom!' someone wrote on Facebook, to protect us from BAD GUYS like Al Queida. Never mind that the former President (well, ok, technically he was called the Vice President) of the United States, Richard Cheney said, "Freedom is a luxury we can no longer afford." That's right. Forget that whole Constitution thingy. Bad for business, and won't let Us keep You Safe.
Technology always seems to rule us. I saw an article a couple of weeks ago (centuries, in Facebook time) showing the latest micro-technology -- Drones the size of mosquitos, fully equipped with both video and audio components, capable of flying in the front door with you, attaching to your clothing to be allowed entrance, etc. All once again, To Protect Us. Are you planning a terrorist operation in your very home?! (Sorry for all the italics and bolds, but this sort of thing does seem to call for shrill editing tricks.)
And on the larger Drone front, the (passed last year by Obama) NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act), allows by Presidential fiat, surveillance of All US citizens, without any need for justification or need for a messy wiretap warrant (Habeas Corpus). Just in case...
Now, I'll ask the question that formed the title of this blog once again. Are You Really Feeling Safer?
But it also brings up the whole idea that We The People have tacitly agreed to be constantly surveilled, for our own protection, ever since 9/11. 'It's the cost of Freedom!' someone wrote on Facebook, to protect us from BAD GUYS like Al Queida. Never mind that the former President (well, ok, technically he was called the Vice President) of the United States, Richard Cheney said, "Freedom is a luxury we can no longer afford." That's right. Forget that whole Constitution thingy. Bad for business, and won't let Us keep You Safe.
Technology always seems to rule us. I saw an article a couple of weeks ago (centuries, in Facebook time) showing the latest micro-technology -- Drones the size of mosquitos, fully equipped with both video and audio components, capable of flying in the front door with you, attaching to your clothing to be allowed entrance, etc. All once again, To Protect Us. Are you planning a terrorist operation in your very home?! (Sorry for all the italics and bolds, but this sort of thing does seem to call for shrill editing tricks.)
And on the larger Drone front, the (passed last year by Obama) NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act), allows by Presidential fiat, surveillance of All US citizens, without any need for justification or need for a messy wiretap warrant (Habeas Corpus). Just in case...
Now, I'll ask the question that formed the title of this blog once again. Are You Really Feeling Safer?
Monday, September 3, 2012
"Should Bible Classes be allowed in public schools?"
This was posted by the novelist Anne Rice on her Facebook Page asking for opinions. This below is my response (expanded, of course).
Ms. Rice I'm sorry, but there's a very great distance between what this Governor is advocating (proselytizing Bible 'studies') and what you're advocating (the history of and discerning what/where/how the 'Bible' has influenced 'Western civilization'). This State Official is advocating the opinions of the most radically Reich in her state to influence any and all students about Das Book (which is really all "The Bible" means since for centuries it was the ONLY Book that was allowed to be 'read' [mostly taught, since only the most powerful could even read]).
This would be simple indoctrination and not anything approaching 'study' at all. This is not Constitutionally valid and therefore should not even be considered and should be struck down with all speed (if possible) by the Supreme Court (not that that's going to happen).
From the article in question: Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has signed into law a bill that allows the establishing of elective classes that focus on the Bible and its influence on western civilization.
Read more at http://www.christianpost.com/news/ariz-governor-signs-bill-to-allow-bible-classes-in-public-schools-73485/#2Rmb6bAVQOzeFMpi.99
"A teacher who instructs a course offered under this section in its [blogger emphasis added] appropriate historical context and in good faith shall be immune from civil liability and disciplinary action," reads the bill.
Ah, and here's the rub. "...in good faith..." There are so many small points of darkness in this potential 'teaching' that boggle the imagination. In bringing in this seemingly benign 'educational opportunity' a gaping hole is being introduced into the Constitutional fabric of the nation. Born-agains are shouting about 'Christian pursecution' while striving to back-door their particular brand of 'Christianity' into the Law of the land.
Never mind that most of the students who would be subject to whatever material that such a 'course' might bring are already 'of The Faith.' So why can't they receive such information from their Church? Because that is not the intent of this 'bill.'
The insidiousness of this 'bill' would be the means of opening similar 'legislation' in other states. It would be a seemingly innocuous teaching of 'history' to any and all who 'wished to partake.' For now.
For those of us whose ideas and beliefs are different from those of the Far Reich, now is the time to speak out against this 'legal means' of 'teaching about "The Bible." ' I am not opposed to the ideas of The Man who they (think they) believe in, but I do oppose any means of further indoctrination in a country that is increasingly non-Christian. Even for those of us who consider ourselves "Christian" (and I count myself [in a qualified way] among those believers), this seems like a non-issue. But I assure you, it isn't.
Labels:
activism,
beliefs,
Bible,
childhood,
Christianity,
conservative policies,
Constitution,
family,
far right wing,
ideological viewpoints,
propaganda,
religion,
religious extremism,
tea party,
the Constitution
Monday, January 2, 2012
Time for a Real Change
On this New Years Day I was going through my email 'drafts' in hotmail, when I came across this. Especially now as we are already deep in the "dialogue" and the compostable rhetoric, this Amendment needs to be brought out and be brought about.
Please email/post it widely. It's time for a Real Change in this Country. Doncha think?
--The 26th amendment (granting the right to vote for 18 year-olds) took only 3 months & 8 days to be ratified. Why? Simple! The people demanded it. That was in 1971...before computers, before e-mail, before cell phones, etc.
Of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, seven (7) took 1 year or less to become the law of the land...all because of public pressure.
Forward this [email] post to a minimum of twenty people on their address list; in turn ask each of those to do likewise.
In three days, most people in The United States of America will have the message. This is one idea that really should be passed around.
Congressional Reform Act of 2011
1. No Tenure / No Pension. A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.
2. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security. All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.
3. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.
4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
5. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.
6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.
7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective 1/1/12. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen/women. Congressmen/women made all these contracts for themselves. Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours need to serve their term(s), then go home and back to work.
8. Any congressman resigning due to unlawful acts receives NO benefits.
If each person contacts a minimum of twenty people, it will only take three days for most people (in the U.S.) to receive the message. Maybe it is time.
Please email/post it widely. It's time for a Real Change in this Country. Doncha think?
--The 26th amendment (granting the right to vote for 18 year-olds) took only 3 months & 8 days to be ratified. Why? Simple! The people demanded it. That was in 1971...before computers, before e-mail, before cell phones, etc.
Of the 27 amendments to the Constitution, seven (7) took 1 year or less to become the law of the land...all because of public pressure.
Forward this [email] post to a minimum of twenty people on their address list; in turn ask each of those to do likewise.
In three days, most people in The United States of America will have the message. This is one idea that really should be passed around.
Congressional Reform Act of 2011
1. No Tenure / No Pension. A Congressman collects a salary while in office and receives no pay when they are out of office.
2. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security. All funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system, and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for any other purpose.
3. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans do.
4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.
5. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the same health care system as the American people.
6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American people.
7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective 1/1/12. The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen/women. Congressmen/women made all these contracts for themselves. Serving in Congress is an honor, not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours need to serve their term(s), then go home and back to work.
8. Any congressman resigning due to unlawful acts receives NO benefits.
If each person contacts a minimum of twenty people, it will only take three days for most people (in the U.S.) to receive the message. Maybe it is time.
Monday, December 26, 2011
Ah, The Republican Feeding Frenzy...
It seems that the Republican Candidates for President have been stumbling all over themselves to make mockeries of... Themselves. From Herman Cain and his 'infinite number of women' to Eye of Newt and his leanings towards his installation as the New Monarch (obviously with no Clothes to hide his bald lies and outrageous statements) to Mitt Romney (a.k.a. King George the Firsts [George Herbert Walker Bush] demented In-Law) and his 'Oh, what's this? This little bar code thingie?', the whole race is turning into hares trying to twist themselves into political pretzels. Too bad the Far Reich Tea Partiers doesn't see these gaffs as disqualify-iers against Higher Office.
Much was made of the Biden gaffs during the last election cycle, but this new batch of stumbler/ bumblers takes the cake (as in "Let Them Eat...") is taking the gaffs to new highs. Newt and his 'If I don't agree with what the Supreme Court decides, I'll haul them in to Congress under arrest if necessary to have them answer to The People' (as if the Little People were the ones he was talking about), take the Fascistic leanings of the Tea Party and their Acolytes to new lows, further deadening the possibility of democracy even further.
What next, Herr Gingrich? Abolishing the Constitution if it doesn't suit you? Instigating Martial Law to enforce your World Views? Even Mad King George the Second didn't do that with the reason of 9/11 to be his excuse.
How much more insane do the Politics of Hate and Deception have to become before even the most dim of political bulbs understands the consequences? How many more rabid Tea Partiers have to make 'jokes' of assassinating a sitting President because of his Color?
If they don't watch out, the feeding frenzy on the horizon will be the Republicans eating themselves alive with their beliefs and opinions.
Much was made of the Biden gaffs during the last election cycle, but this new batch of stumbler/ bumblers takes the cake (as in "Let Them Eat...") is taking the gaffs to new highs. Newt and his 'If I don't agree with what the Supreme Court decides, I'll haul them in to Congress under arrest if necessary to have them answer to The People' (as if the Little People were the ones he was talking about), take the Fascistic leanings of the Tea Party and their Acolytes to new lows, further deadening the possibility of democracy even further.
What next, Herr Gingrich? Abolishing the Constitution if it doesn't suit you? Instigating Martial Law to enforce your World Views? Even Mad King George the Second didn't do that with the reason of 9/11 to be his excuse.
How much more insane do the Politics of Hate and Deception have to become before even the most dim of political bulbs understands the consequences? How many more rabid Tea Partiers have to make 'jokes' of assassinating a sitting President because of his Color?
If they don't watch out, the feeding frenzy on the horizon will be the Republicans eating themselves alive with their beliefs and opinions.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)